Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
FC
KPF
Match Timeline
Momentum
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Kings Park FC
-3 – 65 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Kings Park FC
0 – 9 weighted
0/9 – 2/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
FC Mardan
109 – 67 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.5
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 14.0
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
0/9 – 2/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.5
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 14.0
Before kick off Kings Park FC were favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
84
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Neutral
Fit
No fit
0/5
Squad
66
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Modest boost
Fit
No fit
0/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Dressing-room leaders Subtle
- Playmaker creativity Notable
Matchup Analysis
Kings Park FC's Tiki Taka has the tactical edge over FC Mardan's Counter Attack on paper.
Kings Park FC's Tighten Wings should blunt home's Wing Plays.
Kings Park FC plays with high aggression, so expect fouls and cards.
Kings Park FC has specifically drilled to prepare against the 4-4-2, so expect a more compact back line.
Kings Park FC has 2 natural leaders on the pitch to FC Mardan's 0, giving them a stronger dressing room culture that steadies defence and midfield.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
FC Mardan (4-4-2)
Kings Park FC (4-1-2-1-2)
FC Mardan (4-4-2)
Fares Ait
Oscar
Tomas Correa
Anders Pedersen
Luiz Gustavo
Igor Reis
Ruben Sandoval
Naim Bensebaini
Leonardo Sala
Mickael Hubert
Daniel Romero
Substitutes
Idrissa Niakhate
Lapo Romano
Cesc Vasquez
Nassim El-Yamiq
Carlos Espinoza
Bernardo Veloso
Jens Ludwig
Fouad Bouanga
Mauro Pinto
Kings Park FC (4-1-2-1-2)
Bertrand Caron
Niklas Kristiansen
Alvaro Barbosa PK
Raffaele Santoro
Idrissa Salah
Cengiz Duran
Sven Heitinga P FK
Unai Gonzalez
Youssef Sabbah
Douglas C
Felipe Cavani
Substitutes
Yago Dominguez
Olof Nilsson
Reda Amrani
Sami Saiss
Marcos Herrera
Jesse Verhoeven
Silas Olesen