Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
BLP
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Blue Lock Project
35 – 18 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Blue Lock Project
35 – 13 weighted
8/9 – 3/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Blue Lock Project
84 – 39 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.0
9 above 10 · 2 below 10
Average 12.3
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
8/9 – 3/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.0
9 above 10 · 2 below 10
Average 12.3
Before kick off Blue Lock Project were clear favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
76
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
57
Coverage
Neutral
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Weak fit
1/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Matchup Analysis
Celtic's Jogo Bonito flair can pull Blue Lock Project's balanced shape out of position.
Blue Lock Project's 3-5-2 overloads midfield against Celtic's 4-3-3 (5 vs 3), so expect more ball control.
Celtic sends 3 attackers at a 3-man Blue Lock Project back line, stretching it to breaking point.
Blue Lock Project's 3 defenders have no spare man against Celtic's 3 attackers, so every runner must be tracked.
Blue Lock Project has specifically drilled to prepare against the 4-3-3, so expect a more compact back line.
Blue Lock Project has a tight-marking assignment to limit the opponent's key player.
Blue Lock Project's squad fits Balanced well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Celtic (4-3-3)
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Saul Gallego
Jarrod Kearney P
Imanol Parejo
Ato Oppong
Kang Cai
Antonio De Angelis PK
Virgilio Cruz
Gilberto Vargas
Robson Dantas FK
Emiliano Pintos
Domenico Grassi C
Substitutes
Mathias Rocha
Petr Vanek
Llion Beynon
Riad Abdelli
Zoran Ivanovic
Tianyu Zhang
Joaquin Bermudez
Dario Martinez
Will Farrell
Celtic (4-3-3)
Viktor Sorensen
Rachid El Idrissi FK PK
Ivan Exposito
Lucas Moller P
Adam King
Matej Machala
Muhamed Osmanovic C
Branislav Mitrovic
Kostas Raptis
Arthur Harris
Abderrahmane Sayah
Substitutes
Granit Sejdiu
Slawomir Majewski
Jakob Pichler
Apostolos Galanis
Eduard Gheorghe
Ambroise Kouotou
Moussa Ehui
Oihan Vidal
Pedro Mejia