Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
SAN
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
San Antonio FC
58 – -23 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Ironcrest FC
9 – 35 weighted
2/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Ironcrest FC
108 – 158 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 19.4
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
2/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 19.4
Before kick off San Antonio FC were favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
85
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
No fit
0/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Dressing-room leaders Notable
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
100
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Matchup Analysis
San Antonio FC's Counter Attack threatens the space Ironcrest FC leaves when pressing. Watch for quick breaks.
San Antonio FC can exploit the space behind Ironcrest FC's press with Counter Attack balls in behind.
Ironcrest FC sends 3 attackers at a 3-man San Antonio FC back line, stretching it to breaking point.
San Antonio FC's 3 defenders have no spare man against Ironcrest FC's 3 attackers, so every runner must be tracked.
San Antonio FC's Tighten Wings should blunt away's Wing Plays.
San Antonio FC has specifically drilled to prepare against the 4-3-3, so expect a more compact back line.
San Antonio FC has 3 natural leaders on the pitch to Ironcrest FC's 1, giving them a stronger dressing room culture that steadies defence and midfield.
Ironcrest FC's squad fits Gegenpress well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
San Antonio FC (3-4-3)
Ironcrest FC (4-3-3)
San Antonio FC (3-4-3)
Erik Meyer
Ederson
Simone Costantini
Bjorn Sorensen P
Pablo Ramirez FK PK
Ole Otto
Jordan Evans
Jesus C
Sven Hoffmann
Bruno Conte
Kai Herrmann
Substitutes
Yahya Rachidi
Eric Marty
Bakari Olise
Nicola Sala
Fabrizio Lombardo
Alfred Holmes
Tim Van Veen
Alvaro Nieto
Henrique Lima
Ironcrest FC (4-3-3)
Nabil Labyad
Obafemi Mensah
Marcos Herrera
Justin Klaassen
Akin Gnabry
Marco Duarte P
Ivo Cardoso PK
Joel Turner FK
Danilo Carvalho C
Espen Andersen
Pelé
Substitutes
Joaquin Figueroa
Tyler Fisher
Marcos Molina
Luisao
Stephen Wood
Oliver Aiku
Sergio Cazorla
Niklas Halvorsen
Nacho Santana