Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
BC Vandor
57 – 9 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Tequendama Wanderers
4 – 9 weighted
1/9 – 2/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Tequendama Wanderers
57 – 62 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
10 above 10 · 1 below 10
Average 13.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 13.7
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
1/9 – 2/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
10 above 10 · 1 below 10
Average 13.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 13.7
Before kick off BC Vandor were favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
64
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Slight edge
Fit
No fit
0/5
What fired
- Playmaker creativity Notable
Squad
66
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Slight edge
Fit
Weak fit
2/5
What fired
- Intelligent midfielders Notable
- Dressing-room leaders Subtle
Matchup Analysis
Gegenpress (H) vs Balanced (A). No clear tactical edge on paper.
Tequendama Wanderers's 3-5-2 overloads midfield against BC Vandor's 4-2-4 (5 vs 2), so expect more ball control.
BC Vandor sends 4 attackers at a 3-man Tequendama Wanderers back line, stretching it to breaking point.
Tequendama Wanderers's 3 defenders have no spare man against BC Vandor's 4 attackers, so every runner must be tracked.
BC Vandor plays with high aggression, so expect fouls and cards.
BC Vandor has specifically drilled to prepare against the 3-5-2, so expect a more compact back line.
BC Vandor has a tight-marking assignment to limit the opponent's key player.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
BC Vandor (4-2-4)
Tequendama Wanderers (3-5-2)
BC Vandor (4-2-4)
Travis Dawson C
Hamdi Haj Ali FK
Franco Castellani
Victor Ayinde
Santiago Vazquez
Federico Miranda
Bastiaan Boer
Edier Uribe PK
Farid Madani
Agustin Franco
Dominik Horvat P
Substitutes
Cesar Aranda
Srdjan Jovic
Thor Jorgensen
Emil Lustig
Raffaele Pagano
Keyvan Zamani
Yannick Silue
Ibrahim Ozturk
Alan Diaz
Tequendama Wanderers (3-5-2)
Marcos Bermudez
Mathys Petit
Romeu Bettencourt
Tomas Carrizo
Youssef Naciri
Ariel Ortega
Sean Dawson
Brecht Bogaert
Roko Juric
Simon Stastny
Jin-woo Hong
Substitutes
Rui Tang
Patrizio Russo
Guus Van der Linden
Walter Maldonado
Salem Al-Junaibi
Ryan Rice
Yosuke Kato
Cesar Campos
Lee Brown