Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
BW
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Ironcrest FC
46 – -4 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Ironcrest FC
39 – 30 weighted
9/9 – 7/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Ironcrest FC
158 – 139 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 19.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 18.3
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
9/9 – 7/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 19.4
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 18.3
Before kick off Ironcrest FC were clear favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
100
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Intelligent midfielders Subtle
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
97
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Strong fit
4/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Matchup Analysis
Gegenpress (H) vs Balanced (A). No clear tactical edge on paper.
Ironcrest FC's Tighten Centre counters away's Through Balls.
Ironcrest FC has specifically drilled to prepare against the 4-1-2-1-2, so expect a more compact back line.
Ironcrest FC is tightly marking Barshare Wanderers's playmaker, shutting down their chief creator.
Barshare Wanderers's composed back line (3 players) should weather Ironcrest FC's gegenpress. Press resistance cancels much of the pressing bonus.
Ironcrest FC's squad fits Gegenpress well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Barshare Wanderers's squad fits Balanced well (4/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
Ironcrest FC (3-4-3)
Barshare Wanderers (4-1-2-1-2)
Ironcrest FC (3-4-3)
Nabil Labyad
Walter Conti P
Justin Klaassen
Paulo Teixeira
Joselu Munoz
Marco Duarte
Koen Van Dijk FK
Joel Turner PK
Danilo Carvalho C
Tyler Fisher
Pelé
Substitutes
Levin Krieger
Raffaele Vitali
Alfonso Lara
Salif Bamba
Zied Ouattara
Uwe Frank
Barshare Wanderers (4-1-2-1-2)
Lars Stark C
Peter Murray FK PK
Zied Karmali P
Pierre Lefort
Edwin Van Dam
Danny Adams
Lautaro Acosta
Joost Postma
Habib Triki
Tim Hendriks
Richarlison Coria
Substitutes
Vitinha
Harvey Carr
Danilo Marques
Issa Sangare
Joselu Guerrero
Seydou Keita
Niels Wagner
Gustav Stromberg
Riad Bekkar