Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Ironcrest FC
21 – 0 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Ironcrest FC
39 – 4 weighted
9/9 – 1/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Cumnock Juniors
111 – 134 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.6
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 18.0
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
9/9 – 1/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 16.6
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 18.0
Before kick off Ironcrest FC were clear favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
86
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Intelligent midfielders Notable
- Hold-up forward Major
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
94
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Neutral
Fit
No fit
0/5
Matchup Analysis
Counter Attack (H) vs Direct Play (A). No clear tactical edge on paper.
Ironcrest FC's 3-4-2-1 overloads midfield against Cumnock Juniors's 4-3-3 (6 vs 3), so expect more ball control.
Cumnock Juniors sends 3 attackers at a 3-man Ironcrest FC back line, stretching it to breaking point.
Ironcrest FC's 3 defenders have no spare man against Cumnock Juniors's 3 attackers, so every runner must be tracked.
Ironcrest FC's Tighten Centre counters away's Through Balls.
Cumnock Juniors's long balls should bypass Ironcrest FC's pressing, leaving Ironcrest FC to chase shadows while the ball sails over midfield.
Ironcrest FC has 3 intelligent defenders to Cumnock Juniors's 1. Smarter marking and reading of the game should reduce chances conceded.
Ironcrest FC has a hold-up forward up top, so long balls into Direct Play or Counter Attack will find a foothold instead of being lost.
Ironcrest FC's squad fits Counter Attack well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
Ironcrest FC (3-4-2-1)
Cumnock Juniors (4-3-3)
Ironcrest FC (3-4-2-1)
Uwe Frank
Walter Conti P
Joselu Munoz
Raffaele Vitali C
Marco Duarte
Koen Van Dijk FK
Joel Turner PK
Alfonso Lara
Levin Krieger
Tyler Fisher
Pelé
Substitutes
Paulo Teixeira
Leander Van de Velde
Danilo Carvalho
Salif Bamba
Zied Ouattara
Justin Klaassen
Nabil Labyad
Cumnock Juniors (4-3-3)
Sander Forsberg
Kai Havertz PK
Fabian Reinhardt
Ahmed El-Amin
Henry Edwards FK
Mark Brouwer
Justin Wijnaldum
Matthias Schneider
Maurits Huntelaar
Theo Duval
Jesus
Substitutes
Alejandro Estrada
Joakim Forsberg
Simone Manzoni
Quentin Roux
Cristian Bruno
Edmilson
Damian Correa