Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Even
36 – 36 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Blue Lock Project
30 – 35 weighted
7/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Blue Lock Project
77 – 84 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 14.6
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.0
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
7/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 14.6
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.0
Before kick off this was too close to call.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
72
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Partial fit
3/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
76
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Matchup Analysis
Both teams play Balanced. Expect a tactically familiar battle in midfield.
Hunters FC has specifically drilled to prepare against the 3-5-2, so expect a more compact back line.
Blue Lock Project has specifically drilled to prepare against the 3-5-2, so expect a more compact back line.
Hunters FC is tightly marking Blue Lock Project's playmaker, shutting down their chief creator.
Blue Lock Project is tightly marking Hunters FC's playmaker, shutting down their chief creator.
Blue Lock Project has 2 intelligent defenders to Hunters FC's 0. Smarter marking and reading of the game should reduce chances conceded.
Hunters FC's squad fits Balanced well (3/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Blue Lock Project's squad fits Balanced well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
Hunters FC (3-5-2)
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Hunters FC (3-5-2)
Josh Quinn
Helmut Lange C FK
Caleb Palmer
Vasco Marques
Parker Foster
Jackson Azevedo P
Corrado Fabbri PK
Lucas Saraiva
Valentin Galvan
Archie MacLeod
Lukasz Zalewski
Substitutes
Bram Visser
Momar Coly
Uros Samardzic
Olamide Olaniyan
Marek Wozniak
Kasper Andersson
Sebastian Jara
Mattia Morelli
Ignacio Aguirre
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Saul Gallego
Jarrod Kearney P
Imanol Parejo
Ato Oppong
Kang Cai
Antonio De Angelis PK
Virgilio Cruz
Gilberto Vargas
Robson Dantas FK
Emiliano Pintos
Domenico Grassi C
Substitutes
Mathias Rocha
Petr Vanek
Llion Beynon
Riad Abdelli
Zoran Ivanovic
Tianyu Zhang
Joaquin Bermudez
Dario Martinez
Will Farrell