Sign up to play Title Rivals.
Free multiplayer football management. Pick tactics, develop your squad, and compete with real managers.
NGF
BLP
Live Commentary
Who won each pillar
Tactics
Ninja Gulild FC
44 – 35 weighted
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
Squad Fit
Blue Lock Project
13 – 35 weighted
3/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Squad Strength
Blue Lock Project
49 – 86 weighted
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
9 above 10 · 2 below 10
Average 12.9
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.1
Built from the rows below. Philosophy shows the margin, since both styles score.
3/9 – 8/9 ticks, as a share of 39 pts. The philosophy row counts one tick per requirement.
Weighted = (rating + form − 10) × 16.8.
Each value is the player's skill plus their form bonus.
9 above 10 · 2 below 10
Average 12.9
11 above 10 · 0 below 10
Average 15.1
Before kick off Blue Lock Project were clear favourites.
Weighted points put all three pillars on one scale. Each card shows how its number is worked out. One match still carries real luck.
Team Strength at Kickoff
How strong each side was with the tactics they used. Squad quality caps the team. Pitch coverage asks how well the XI covered the nine zones for the chosen style. Tactic unlocks are the philosophy and trait bonuses that actually fired. Philosophy fit measures how well the XI met the chosen style's trait requirements. Opponent-specific edges (matchups, home advantage, referee) are scored elsewhere.
Squad
60
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Modest boost
Fit
Weak fit
1/5
What fired
- Playmaker creativity Major
Squad
76
Coverage
Good fit
Unlocks
Strong boost
Fit
Perfect fit
5/5
What fired
- Leader captain Major
- Playmaker creativity Major
Matchup Analysis
Gegenpress (H) vs Balanced (A). No clear tactical edge on paper.
Blue Lock Project's 3-5-2 overloads midfield against Ninja Gulild FC's 4-3-3 (5 vs 3), so expect more ball control.
Ninja Gulild FC sends 3 attackers at a 3-man Blue Lock Project back line, stretching it to breaking point.
Blue Lock Project's 3 defenders have no spare man against Ninja Gulild FC's 3 attackers, so every runner must be tracked.
Ninja Gulild FC has specifically drilled to prepare against the 3-5-2, so expect a more compact back line.
Blue Lock Project has specifically drilled to prepare against the 4-3-3, so expect a more compact back line.
Ninja Gulild FC is tightly marking Blue Lock Project's playmaker, shutting down their chief creator.
Blue Lock Project has a tight-marking assignment to limit the opponent's key player.
Blue Lock Project has 2 intelligent defenders to Ninja Gulild FC's 0. Smarter marking and reading of the game should reduce chances conceded.
Blue Lock Project's composed back line (3 players) should weather Ninja Gulild FC's gegenpress. Press resistance cancels much of the pressing bonus.
Blue Lock Project's squad fits Balanced well (5/5 requirements). Expect a chance quality bonus on every attack.
Pitch Heat Map
Nine-zone strength snapshot for each side at kickoff. Brighter = stronger in that third and channel. Both grids read from their own team's perspective: rows run attack to defence, and left and right are that team's own. So one side's left attack meets the other side's right defence.
Ninja Gulild FC (4-3-3)
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Ninja Gulild FC (4-3-3)
Guillermo Ruiz
Ferran Guerrero
Nathan Robertson
Ramin Heidari PK
Brandon Russell
Franklin Quintero
Parker Baker P
Marcos Zambrano
Cameron Evans
Roman Danyliuk
Ugo Rizzo
Substitutes
Tome Vilela
Young-ho Yun
Jawad Berrada
Gaston Zabala
Donny Van Til
David Mora
Patrizio Maggi
Adrian Arevalo
Taras Onyshchenko
Blue Lock Project (3-5-2)
Saul Gallego
Jarrod Kearney P
Imanol Parejo
Ato Oppong
Kang Cai
Antonio De Angelis PK
Virgilio Cruz
Gilberto Vargas
Robson Dantas FK
Emiliano Pintos
Domenico Grassi C
Substitutes
Mathias Rocha
Petr Vanek
Llion Beynon
Riad Abdelli
Zoran Ivanovic
Tianyu Zhang
Joaquin Bermudez
Dario Martinez
Will Farrell